The Counter Crusade

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

My New Blog

Click here


http://riyada.blogspot.com/

Saturday, April 08, 2006

The Beginning, The End, The New Beginning

Alright. So I started this blog because I saw Islam being attacked everywhere rather unfairly. They say, "look Islam says such and such a thing" when they dont realize the Bible says the exact same thing or much worse. Same goes for the Torah or another religious book. They say "look what the Muslims are doing" while Hindus do far worse things and no one talks about them. Etc, etc. It becomes quite clear that Islam is not being attacked for something wrong with Islam itself... There is nothing wrong with Islam itself (although there is MUCH that is wrong with Muslims). Islam was attacked because it was the new political enemy, and with all the media distortions and everything it became everyone's enemy... it was under the spotlight.

And then I saw all those Muslims trying to defend Islam from this, defend Islam from that... and they all sounded like weak apologists, the ones at the bottom trying to become level with the rest of the world. BAHUMBUG! Islam is and always has been far superior morally and spiritually to any thought system in the history of Planet Earth, and everyone else is supposed to be trying to catch up with it. Muslims are supposed to be criticizing everyone else for not being up to par with Islamic standards. Why are we playing the role of the weak? Why are we on the defensive instead of the offensive? Yes, we're being attacked, but we're supposed to launch a counter-attack. To take control. To reverse the situation. Turn the tables. Being on the defensive all the time makes you look weak in the eyes of everyone else. And eventually you see in yourself what others see in you.

And thus the blog was started...

But then I came to realize one little problem... I just couldn't do it. Oh I wrote a great list of so many topics to write about. I still have it lying around somewhere. I had lots of great stuff to talk about. But I just couldn't do it. I'm not like those hateful anti-Islamic shayateen attacking Islam online out of pure hatred. Even though what I was supposed to write was completely different, and not hateful at all. I just wanted to point out where Islam was superior and where others were being hypocritical in criticizing Islam. But even that I couldn't do. I could show that they're wrong about Islam, but I just could't get myself to show them how they have the same things in their sacred texts, or how they have bad things compared to the Qur'an. I couldn't say, "well why don't you look at Hindus and what they're doing about this", or "did you know of such and such problems with the Bible.." etc, etc. I could write a few, but I couldn't keep it up. It's just not in me. Maybe someone else can pick up where I left off and do this. But not me. I'm not even sure it's Islamic. Even though I AM convinced that the offensive is far better than the defensive (better strategically). But still, I couldn't get myself to do it.

And don't get me wrong. The point of the counter-attack was never to just say "oh yeah? well look at the problems that you people have!" No.. the point was to get people to ask: "If these issues that Islam is being criticized for, exist in all these other religions/cultures... and if all that other stuff is going on with such and such a religion or culture... why is it that no one is talking about them? Why is it that everyone is only talking about Islam?" And thus to bring about the realization that Islam is the political enemy of the age, chosen by certain groups. And that is the SOLE reason it was put under the spotlight. If it was not so, no one would be talking about Islam right now.

And so, not being comfortable at pointing out flaws in other people, I had no material I could feel good about using for my blog. It was called "The Counter Crusade". But there was no Crusade. It was more of a defensive with a little stone thrown at the crusaders once in a while. And so, I dont see how "The Counter Crusade" blog can go on. I think this became obvious to anyone reading my blog long ago. The problem was the theme of the blog.

And so I'm ending this, and starting something new. Something much more flexible where I can write all the time about different topics, and not be constrainted by the title of the blog. Something that I feel more comfortable writing about. And if anyone wants to join me, ahlan wa sahlan.

What about?

“Verily Allah will never change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.” (Q 13:11)

We're all talking about how the ummah needs to change. Well, I'm gonna start talking about how I need to change. Each and every one of us starts to look at himself before he looks at others. By changing what is in ourselves, we change what the people around us. This is a universal truth, recognized by sages of every culture and religion. I'm gonna talk about my efforts to improve my worship. To improve my health. To improve my body and mind. To improve my spiritual himma (will, effort). And I'm hoping others will join me in this, in discussing the issues important to them or even documenting their own progress. This is how a true revolution happens. By taking action first within ourselves. And by extension, the blog will talk about the ummah... New ideas. Social change. Regime change. Revolution. Religious Thought. Environmental issues. Everything. We talk about each of these issues, and every week or so I (and anyone who wishes to do so as well), will give an update on my own physical/spiritual progress.


Anyway, anyone who wants to join, let me know. You just have to be a Muslim wanting to change what is in you so that Allah may change the condition of our ummah. But it's not that important, as I plan to do this anyway. I will have this blog forcing me to improve myself. I have to post my progress online every week. This will encourage me to work harder, inshalla.

Wassalam.

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Solar Eclipse

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


Today a solar eclipse was visible in many parts of the world. The picture above was taken in Ghana. On January 27th, 632 C.E., or the 10th year after the Hijra, a solar eclipse was witnessed at 10 a.m local time by the inhabitants of Medina (see scientific details). Here are the events of that day:


Illness and Death of Ibrahim

Muhammad's attachment to his son had nothing to do with either his faith or with his mission. ...he had lost his two sons, al Qasim and al Tahir, at a tender age, and his daughters-even after they grew to maturity, married, and bore children-so that only Fatimah remained of all his progeny. Naturally, these sons and daughters who passed away one after the other and were buried by Muhammad's own hand left their father with a severe sense of bereavement. It was natural that a father so bereaved would feel excessive joy and the strongest personal pride and hope at the birth and growing of a son.

The promise and hope which Ibrahim represented were not to last long. Soon, the child fell seriously ill. He was moved to a date orchard near Mashrabat Umm Ibrahim, where his mother and Sirin, her sister, looked after him. When his state worsened and it became apparent that he will not live long, Muhammad was called. He was so shocked at the news that he felt his knees could no more carry him, and asked `Abd al Rahman ibn `Awf to give him his hand to lean upon. He proceeded immediately to the orchard and arrived in time to bid farewell to an infant dying in his mother's lap. Muhammad took the child and laid him in his own lap with shaking hand. His heart was torn apart by the new tragedy, and his face mirrored his inner pain. Choking with sorrow, he said to his son, "O Ibrahim, against the judgment of God, we cannot avail you a thing," and then fell silent. Tears flowed from his eyes. The child lapsed gradually, and his mother and aunt watched and cried loudly and incessantly, but the Prophet never ordered them to stop. As Ibrahim surrendered to death, Muhammad's hope which had consoled him for a brief while completely crumbled. With tears in his eyes he talked once more to the dead child: "O Ibrahim, were the truth not certain that the last of us will join the first, we would have mourned you even more than we do now." A moment later he said: "The eyes send their tears and the heart is saddened, but we do not say anything except that which pleases our Lord. Indeed, O Ibrahim, we are bereaved by your departure from us."

Aware of Muhammad's sorrow, the wise among the Muslim sought to remind the Prophet that he himself had commanded against indulgence in self-pity after a bereavement. Muhammad, however, answered: "I have not commanded against sadness, but against raising one's voice in lamentation. What you see in me is the effect of the love and compassion in my heart for my lost one. Remember that whoever feels no compassion toward others will not receive any compassion." These may not have been his exact words, but the meaning remains the same. Muhammad tried to sublimate his sadness and lighten his sorrow, and, looking toward Mariyah and Sirin, he said to them in appeasement that Ibrahim would have his own nurse in Paradise. Umm Burdah, or according to another version, al Fadl ibn `Abbas, washed the body of the child in preparation for burial. He was carried on a little bed by the Prophet, his uncle al `Abbas, and a number of Muslims to the cemetery of Abu Bakr where, after a funeral prayer recited by the Prophet, he was laid down to rest. As Muhammad ordered the grave closed, he filled it with sand, sprinkled some water, and placed a landmark on it. He then said "Tombstones do neither good nor ill, but they help appease the living. Anything that man does, God wishes him to do well."

The death of Ibrahim coincided with the eclipse of the sun, a phenomenon the Muslims saw as a miracle. They went about saying that the sun was eclipsed in sadness over the death of Ibrahim. The Prophet heard them. Would his exceeding love for Ibrahim and deep sorrow over his loss not enable him to find in such rumors a measure of consolation? Would he not at least keep his silence and thus allow the people to believe what they had taken to be a miracle? Certainly not. Such an attitude surely belongs to those who exploit the ignorance and credulity of the people; for those whom suffering and sorrow push beyond reason and common sense. It does not belong to the man of genuine wisdom, nor a fortiori, to the great Prophet. Hence, looking to those who claimed the sun was in eclipse because of the death of Ibrahim, Muhammad said, "The sun and the moon are signs of God. They are eclipsed neither for the death nor birth of any man. On beholding an eclipse, therefore, remember God and turn to Him in prayer." What greatness! Even in his moment of greatest personal disaster this Prophet preserved his cool presence of mind. He remained fully conscious of his message and most serious in his commitment to it. And even the Orientalists could not hide their admiration and wonder when they came across this fact in the life of Muhammad. Even they could not fail to acknowledge the genuineness of the man who insisted on truth even in face of the greatest personal adversity. [1]






"In all things Muhammad was profoundly practical. When his beloved son Ibrahim died, an eclipse occurred, and rumours of God's personal condolence quickly arose. Whereupon Muhammad is said to have announced, "An eclipse is a phenomenon of nature. It is foolish to attribute such things to the death or birth of a human being." "At Muhammad's own death an attempt was made to deify him, but the man who was to become his administrative successor killed the hysteria with one of the noblest speeches in religious history: "If there are any among you who worshipped Muhammad, he is dead. But if it is God you worshipped, He lives forever." [2]

-------------------

1. Muhammad Husayn Haykal, The Life of Muhammad (pbuh)
2. James A. Michener, "ISLAM: THE MISUNDERSTOOD RELIGION," in READER'S DIGEST (American edition), May 1955, pp. 68-70.

Saturday, March 25, 2006

The 9/11 Buzz

What really happened on 9/11? More than 4 years after the events, the internet is exploding with discussions on the topic. Fox News and CNN have both discussed this topic this week. (see this discussion of the CNN and Fox coverage).

Check also the video i put up two posts ago.

Below is a trascript of CNN Showbiz Tonight's interview with Alex Jones on the topic. Alex Jones can be a little crazy but he's brave and makes some damn good points.

Another thing that happened this week... Perhaps the most active student member of " Scholars for 9/11 Truth" was shot dead on Friday. Michael Zebuhr was walking with his mother when two men with weapons asked for his mother's purse. She handed it to them without resistance and he did not try to do anything. Then they shot him twice in the head. Why shoot him if they had the purse and he didnt do anything? Twice in the head? They must have really wanted him dead. Maybe someone's sending out a message to the 9/11 Scholars. (read this blog to find out who Michael Zebuhr was and a discussion of his death.)


"Mike had organized a 9/11 student group on campus, had collected various 9/11 videos, and was in the process of arranging to have them shown on campus. Mike talked about 9/11 with everyone and anyone he met and had handouts to give them. " (see for more on his involvement in spreading the message on 9/11.)

**EDIT: I thought I should add this extra comment after some other blog quoted me as an example of conspiracy theory "nutjobs" for discussing the murder of Michael Zebuhr. I never said that his murder was most likely 9/11-related . In fact, its much MORE likely it was simply a murder. Maybe the thief got nervous and shot the guy. But I did ask the questions because the guy was shot twice in the head before he had a chance to show his 9/11 videos on campus to thousands of students. It was just a question. I didnt claim this as fact. I dont claim the alternative 9/11 theories as fact either. It's all theory. It was an interesting 9/11-related story that happened this week, and something a lot of blogs are talking about. Again, this post was about the 9/11 Buzz and all things related. But should such questions be raised? Sure, because there is a chance it wasnt simply a theft turned deadly. The problem is some people dont like anyone asking questions. Period. If you ask questions, you're a nut-job. Why was Michael Zebuhr killed? Only God knows.**



Below is the transcript from CNN's Showbiz Tonight. Their current poll question asks the question: "Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks?". Results so far: 83% said YES!
-----------------------------------------------------------------

HAMMER: Hello, I`m A.J. Hammer, live in New York City.
ANDERSON: And I`m Brooke Anderson, live in Hollywood.

A.J., it`s been incredible. Pretty hard to believe, actually, the response we got today to the incredible story SHOWBIZ TONIGHT broke last night. Actor Charlie Sheen`s startling claims that the government may be covering up what really happened on September 11.

HAMMER: So many e-mails coming in. We`ve been really overwhelmed today. Between the e-mails, the blogs, the web sites, everybody is writing and talking about it.

Charlie Sheen made the comments during a hard-to-believe interview on a radio show. And don`t move because in just a moment the host of the radio show, the guy who actually spoke with Sheen, is going to join me live here on SHOWBIZ TONIGHT. But first let`s get you up to speed on the latest developments.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

SHEEN: The more you look at stuff, especially specific incidents, specific events, in or around the fateful day, it just-- it just raises a lot of questions.

HAMMER: The questions Charlie Sheen is raising about the 9/11 attacks are raising a lot of eyebrows. Our e-mail inbox immediately started to overflow. And the coverage on SHOWBIZ TONIGHT is getting a lot of attention.

The web site 9/11 Blogger calls SHOWBIZ TONIGHT`s coverage, quote, "The first time a major news station has covered 9/11 questions in any reasonable format."

It all started with a radio interview Sheen gave to GCN Radio Network host Alex Jones, a cult hero of sorts to 9/11 conspiracy theorists. During the interview, Sheen made clear that he backs Jones` views.

SHEEN: We`re not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue. It seems to me like, you know, 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory.

HAMMER: Sheen also made another shocking suggestion: that we may not know the full story about the collapse of the World Trade Center.

SHEEN: I have a hard time believing that a fireball traveled down the elevator over 110 feet and still had the explosive energy to destroy the lobby like it was described.

I said, "Hey, call me insane. But did it sort of look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?"

If I was your age, I could only dream about my parents splitting up.

HAMMER: As the star of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men," Sheen is seen weekly by about 10 million people. And many of them may end up paying attention to his controversial comments about 9/11.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

HAMMER: As I mentioned the radio host who interviewed Sheen is Alex Jones of the Genesis Communications Network. Alex joins me live from Austin, Texas, to talk about Sheen`s riveting comments.

Alex, as I mentioned, the response that we got from doing this story last night absolutely shocking. So I want to know how it actually all came about. How did the interview with Charlie Sheen actually happen? Did you guys reach out to him? Did he call you? What was the deal?

ALEX JONES, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Well, just to make something clear, Mr. Sheen has amazing courage to do what he`s done. And he contacted me. He`s been watching my documentaries for years. He`s one of the most informed people that I`ve talked to in Hollywood on this subject.

Listen, for years Hollywood`s been on fire with people knowing the truth about 9/11. And I was the first to expose 9/11 on the day. In fact two months before I had intel that elements of the military industrial complex were going to carry out the attack. I said they`ll use bin Laden, the known CIS. That is their patsy to take the blame for attacking the towers.

So Mr. Sheen is only exceptional in that he has courage in going public. Courage that no one else in Hollywood had.

I mean, here`s a CNN poll from Anderson Cooper a year and a half ago where they said is the government covering up 9/11? Could they be involved? Ninety percent when the poll closed on CNN said this.

So listen I have my own syndicated show. I`ve done 4,000 radio interviews in the last 4 1/2 years. Almost no one calls in and disagrees now. We have the majority view and we have the evidence.

And bottom line, there are declassified U.S. government documents like Operation Northwoods that ABC News reported on back in 2000. Operation Northwoods. Google it.

And in there the U.S. government -- an element of it -- said we want to hi-jack jets by remote control, crash them and blame it on the Soviet Union in Cuba. Now that was decades ago. This is why we believe this.

Then you look at the official story. The firefighters, the police, hundreds of them saying there were bomb in the buildings. They were told to shut up. You look at building seven, detonators going off. You can see the explosion.

HAMMER: And Alex, a lot of this is what Charlie Sheen was covering. I`m actually just curious. Did he reach out to you guys? Is he the one who put the call into you and how he wound up on your show?

JONES: Sure. Sure. He called me a few weeks ago and said that -- said that he loves this country. He has nothing to gain from this. In fact it`s dangerous for him to do.

HAMMER: Sure, sure.

JONES: He said, "I love this country and my kids so much that I`m going to do this, Alex."

And I said, "God bless you" because now it makes for other Hollywood people who`ve got major pull who know the truth to start going public.

HAMMER: And dangerous indeed to do. Because a lot of what he said makes a lot of people sort of sit back and say, "Whoa, I don`t know about that."

And what`s really important here. You may not agree with everything that Charlie Sheen had to say. I personally think it`s a good thing that he did go on your show, so he could go public with his point of view. Because it does get people talking.

You know, there are a lot of people who may look at this, however, and say there just goes another Hollywood nut job shooting off his mouth.

JONES: Listen -- listen...

HAMMER: I imagine that you think, though, having a Hollywood actor on your side is a good thing and, as you mention, may bring some more people to the table talking about this.

JONES: Sure, sure. If you knew some of the Hollywood names that are aware of 9/11. We`re talking some of the biggest people.

HAMMER: Any you can tell us about that you`ve been in contact with?

JONES: No, I can`t. Because -- because people in Hollywood contact me because I have integrity, and I`ve been in a few films and they know me. And they know I keep my mouth shut.

You know, it was kind of like back in high school. I learned to keep my mouth shut about girls I was dating and all the girls started liking you.

Look, it`s really simple. Let`s understand this, OK? Nine-eleven was an inside job. It was a self-inflicted wound. And -- and what Charlie Sheen is doing is just amazing, and he can only be commended for it. And all he`s calling for is a real investigation.

I go further at InfoWars.com and PrisonPlanet.com. We lay out how it happened and what took place.

And it`s not just Charlie Sheen I`ve interviewed. CNN has interviewed some of these people, the only network that I`ve seen doing it. You guys have interviewed. There have been physics professors that have gone public. There have been the heads of mining colleges that have gone public.

George Bush Sr.`s top CIA adviser who briefed him and Ronald Reagan, one of the highest little guys at the CIA, says our government is clearly involved in carrying out terror to blame it on foreign enemies.

Did you know that on CIA.gov they admit that they carried out terror attacks in 1953 to blame it on Mohammed Mozadek (ph) in Iran as a pretext to overthrow Iran?

HAMMER: Alex -- I`m going to rein -- all good stuff and all stuff that needs to be talked about. But I`m going to rein you back in here to the topic at hand.

JONES: Sure.

HAMMER: One thing that I think is interesting. You know, as I mentioned we`ve gotten this overwhelming response. The e-mail has not stopped coming in. Most of the e-mail I`ve been getting has been supporting the fact that we are bringing attention to something that is rarely talked about in mainstream media.

JONES: Yes, sir. You have courage. No one else has done what you`re doing.

HAMMER: And I appreciate you saying that. So the question is why? Why have so many of the major media outlets not talked about these alternative theories that exist behind 9/11? Why is that?

JONES: Mark Twain said that, "In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared and scorned. But in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be patriot."

A lot of people don`t have the courage that you have, A.J. A lot of people don`t have the courage of Charlie Sheen. They don`t have the courage of the German defense minister, Andre Van Bulow (ph), who two years ago went public...

HAMMER: What do you think is afraid of that`s going to happen to them?

JONES: They`re afraid of being beaten up by the hordes of neocon intimidators who try to go out there with their Gestapo Nazi tactics to try to bludgeon everybody with their blogs and radio shows to shut up.

But they`ve lost, pal, because people have learned that they`re a bunch of liars. They lied about WMDs. They lied about everything. And now their credibility is totally blown.

The new White House memo just came out where Bush is talking about staging the shoot down of American planes to get -- to blame it on Saddam. That`s public. That`s admitted.

HAMMER: Let`s talk about some public documents. Because obviously experts, government commissions, countless officials have all come out and supported what is the official line.

JONES: Yes, they call it Henry Kissinger independent.

HAMMER: Right. Well, we know that those documents are out there and that people are supporting them. So I guess what some people watching us tonight may be thinking is, well, why the heck should I be listening to Charlie Sheen or to Alex Jones and his web site on this matter?

JONES: They shouldn`t. They shouldn`t. They shouldn`t believe me. They shouldn`t believe you. They shouldn`t believe George Bush. They shouldn`t believe the Keane Commission where almost the entire commission has conflicts of interest and was appointed by Bush. You`ve got to love this. He appoints his own commission, and then the media calls it independent.

Did you know that the "9/11 Whitewash Commission" claims there were no columns in tower one and two when they had 47 of the biggest columns in the world up until that time? They won`t say why building seven had blast points going off down the side.

HAMMER: Well, Alex -- Alex, I`m afraid I`ve got to cut you off because we`re out of time. But as I said, it`s sparking debate. It`s getting people talking. And I appreciate you help bringing it up.

JONES: Thank you. Go to InfoWars.com, sir. Find out the truth at PrisonPlanet.com.

HAMMER: Alex Jones, live from Austin.

And as I mentioned we`ve gotten so many e-mails on the subject. We`ll read what some of you have to say coming up a bit later in the show.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Planet of the Arabs

coming to a theater near you:



Friday, March 03, 2006

WHOA

Who's seen this?



they make some damn good points! Everybody better see this and tell me what you think. Steve, you like to dispute everything, what do you think? i mean ive read about (almost) all these points before but never seen so much footage that confirms it.

its spreading and everyone who's watching this is emailing it to everyone they know!

send everyone this link where they can watch it: http://www.911revisited.com/

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

dum, dum, dum

... i can think of nothing to write about.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

For the Sake of the Women: The Beginnings of the Iraqi Jihad Movement

I was reading a very interesting article on the rising Jihadi movements in the Middle East, and something very interesting became clear: the reason the resistance movement began in Iraq was women. And the reason many Jordanians today are trying to go fight in Iraq is for the very same reason: to protect the honor of Iraqi women! Of course this is not the only reason, and it might not be the main reason anymore, but it is a reason- and a reason that should not be ignored.

Now the article is very very long, and contains a lot of information about many different jihadist movements. The women thing was never pointed out in the article, but when you see how it pops up more than once by different people, you begin to realize its importance.



THE BEGINNING

"Few people are in a better position to understand how the jihadist aspect of the Iraqi insurgency took shape than Huthaifa Azzam, because he, a Jordanian, helped start it. He is the son of Abdullah Azzam, who was born near Jenin, Palestine, in 1941, left for Jordan following the 1967 Six-Day War and became something like the father of jihad in Jordan.

[you should read the article for the details here about Huthaifa Azzam's life up till he went to start the movement in Iraq]


Three days after America’s invasion of Iraq began, Azzam and other followers of his late father crossed over from Jordan into Iraq and established a base for themselves in Falluja. The only source for this is Azzam himself, but his telling the story at all involved some risk to him, and his command of the detail and of the personalities involved lent him credibility; it also matched up well with information I had gathered on earlier reporting trips to Falluja and Baghdad. “We were trying to convince Muslim scholars to begin the resistance,” he said. “They had no plan. They were sleeping. For one month they did not agree. They said, ‘Go back to your country.”’

For Azzam, leaving Iraq alone to work out its own fate was not an option. He said he believed that resistance would start, and he wanted to shape the process as well as hurry it. “We were more than 30 or 40 Arabs, without weapons,” he said. “We went from mosque to mosque, from school to school. People said, ‘The U.S. brought us democracy!’ They believed the lies of Bush that he will bring democracy and freedom.”

Everything changed, he said, on April 28, 2003, when American soldiers killed 15 demonstrators in Falluja, then killed 2 more in a subsequent demonstration. (Iraqis said that the first demonstration had been to protest the Americans’ using an elementary school as a military base.) After that, rumors spread of four American soldiers raping a 17-year-old girl, with pictures distributed on the Internet. (Those pictures may well have been fabricated.) “This story was the main cause of starting the resistance in Falluja,” Azzam said. It “made them reconsider, but there was still no action. I was watching from afar — with a smile. In the beginning they had said, ‘Go make jihad in your own country.’ After the rape story, they said, ‘O.K., we want to start now, or tomorrow we will find our mothers or daughters or sisters raped.’ This story exploded the resistance in Falluja. They called us for a meeting and said, ‘You were right.’ We had told them from the first day that the Iraqi Army abandoned weapons that they should take, but they said this is stealing, haram, looting. You could buy an R.P.G. for three U.S. dollars in those days.”

Azzam says he spent four months in Iraq imparting his knowledge of guerrilla warfare to the indigenous resistance. His background, he told me, gave him immediate currency. “I am the son of Abdullah Azzam,” he said, “so everybody wanted to listen. And I have experience in three or four jihads in different countries, and a lot of the Iraqi resistance had no plan. We gave them our experience so they could start from where we stopped, so they don’t start from zero. Jihad is an obligation as a Muslim. If you can’t support jihad with fighting, you can support with ideas or teaching. So we tried, and we still do. Followers of Abdullah Azzam helped plan the resistance in all of Iraq, and we had hoped for a united resistance with Shias. We were aiming to bring unity between Sunnis and Shias with resistance on both sides, but the Shia leadership was against us, and Zarqawi spoiled it, making it fail.” "


NOW


Now the author of the article moves on to a different group: 10 Jordanians during a trial in a military court in Jordan, being charged for crossing to Syria with automatic weapons and meeting with members of jihad groups there, for the sake of fighting in Iraq.


As the judge was reading out the charges, the prisoners erupted in protest. “I am not guilty — you are guilty!” shouted one prisoner.

“Jihad is not guilt,” shouted another. “... We are protecting the honor of our sisters in Iraq. Is that guilt?"



You may think I'm making too much out of these two quotes. I don't know. Like I said above, this is only one reason, but an important one, I think, nevertheless.


Iraq's Jordanian Jihadis